The toxic server farms of Memphis—to take one example—are overheating with discussion of western U-turns on Israel. I don’t want to piss on the chips—they have been sodden for the last 20 months—but haven’t those 20 months revealed the level of cynical calculation involved?
From hasbora to controlled opposition, BBC to Piers Morgan Uncensored, the hyper-Machiavelllian calculus involved requires artificial intelligence to construct or deconstruct, like the military and paramilitary stratagems it mis/represents.
As for UK politicians, latecomer statements in the House of Commons can be largely be dismissed as ass-saving—or simply politics.
Piers Morgan is a more curious case. It is tempting—and simpler—to think that, after 20 months of live streamed atrocities, conscience has finally banged the doors of his head open. Likewise a recent guest on Morgan’s show, former “Israeli” PM Ehud Olmert.
Even if that were the case, their words are outweighed by their tardiness. But aren’t we being naive?As I set out last year, the stakes could not be higher.
Whether in faith or bad faith, the calculus subtends supreme power. Either the Messiah comes—and is either Jesus or David—or the Messiah does not come. Either way we reach the apex of the “Judaeo-Christian” complex.
I will explore that in a coming series of posts.
For now though, back to Morgan. A quick skim of exchanges with Natasha Hausdorff of UK Lawyers for “Israel” or Tzipi Hotovely “Israeli” amabassador to the UK, demonstrates his blunt opposition to their views. The videos went viral.
This is the same Piers Moral Quandary Morgan who for 20 months began every interview with anti-genocide protestors with the shibboleth Do you condemn Hamas?’ Indeed, he chucks it in after the Hausdorff performance, to the speechless bemusement of Palestinian journalist Ahmad Alnaouq.
What is Morgan up to?
To the “Israeli” encampment, he has “shown his true colours.” Presumably that means “antisemitic.”
To the anti-genocide consensus, he has “finally woken up.”
I’m not buying it.
Ok, Morgan has chilren. No doubt he has a conscience but it is a card he has overplayed. Anyone familair with his channel knows the spiel about opposition to Blair’s invasion of Iraq, how he comes from a military family with Irish backbone and is unafraid to call a spade a spade and so on..
Yet his infamous moral quandary persisted 20 months, based on single premise: October 7 and its corollary, Israel has a right to defend itself. If IDF soldiers stroke psyops subjects blowing up schools didn’t do it—different rules apply to “Israelis”—Keir Starmer dashed the hasbora paint off that one.
As for Hamas is a proscribed terrorist organistion, we have Netanyahu explaining his strategy to fund, provoke and use Hamas to sway Western opinion in his favour on tape!
Netanyahu has served his purpose. Like Elon Musk, he is washed. In the high stakes game of Third Temples and Supreme Control, even they are expendable. If they go quietly, a quiet life in Neom or Palm Beach awaits. If necessary, they get the Kashoggi or Epstein treatment.
The AI-powered hasbora machine now sees Netanyahu, Hotovely, UKLFI and likely a good many other faces as liabilities. As any strategist knows, it must sacrifice certain disguises in order to maintain the masque. Lose a battle, win the war.
Netanyahu is headed for the underside of the bus. He has done his job—destroyed Gaza and created trillions of trade deficit for the MIC. Deposing him will pave the way for Chapter Two: The West Bank.
Will it be Smotrich or Ben-Gvir who takes over? Possibly. More likely, according to the Rightwards Drift Playbook, it will be some “centrist” —hence Olmert’s “dissent.” No doubt there are other candidates besides him.
How are those chips looking?